top of page

NOTE****

Commissioner Trilla Bahrke did NOT accept or read Swedelius' Exhibit reply to Witness Statements.

JF's Witness Graham Vilkin

JF's elective witness - Graham Vilkin-

 

MS. SWEDELIUS REPLY TO- MR. FUNK’S DV- 120 Response – REASONS, I DO NOT AGREE-

TDR # 0000666.

 

 

Witness Graham Vilkin:

 

His comments are pertaining to (event 5/18/14).

 

In paragraph three of Mr. Funk’s response this scenario is listed but in my opinion unrelated to Jeffrey initiating a physical threat that was current of deemed necessary or even a response by your wife and witness (Morgan Vilkin) however,

 

I’m glad he brought it to the table for discussion. 

 

Paragraph One:

Sentence One-

This witness is also clearly shows Funk electively came to my residential area, for a party purpose. 

 

Sentence Two-

Witness Graham Vilkin (party friend of Jeffrey Funk) and who’s wife who doesn’t want to get involved the two who bully me): writes,

“My phone rang and it was Jeff saying that he couldn’t make it up the street because Jess was blocking the road in her car”.

{this is the situation stemmed from Mr. Funk is speeding & near hit me –while I try going about/minding my own business (with comfortable uninterrupted anonymity) at the start to this altercation. 

 

Mr. Vilkin shows where Mr. Funk initiated coming into the residential area

Witness Vilkin, helps describe Jeff Funk was toward the entrance to my street – because that where my car & I happen to have been was where I live.

 

Further more

Showing Graham Vilkin states that rang him while incident was occurring (prior knowledge per Jessica showed there was this first half to the sidetracking witness statements).

 

 

 

 

Graham Vilkin and I agree I was in my car.

 

Sentence Three-

Witness Vilkin  and I agree he clearly states this was serious; further more

Witness Graham shows where the two boys like to work together in provoking times. 

 

Sentence Eight—

Witness Vilkin, I object—(see my testimony in reply to Mr. Funk’s repose paragraph three where I address this in detail.

 

 

Sentence Eight —

Graham Vilkin and I agree I did voice my concerns to Jeffrey Lauer.

Object to second half of your sentence (but name throwing is not why I’m here).

(see more detail- witness Jeffrey Lauer’s report & my own in reply to Mr. Funk’s response paragraph three).

 

Sentence Nine-Eleven

embellished and but no need to argue more.

 

Sentence Thirteen-

This is another place I put the uncomfortable tone

Shows Graham’s subtleties in his commentary – about a weapon.

(These peolpe have a nack for  bullying, reversing subject matter on ‘subject’ and qre frequenting a know drug house to whom Jeff has move Carin ((from Columbine area background) (in &out prior))). 

 

Sentence Sixteen-

Proves I tried a civil request to communicate but to no avail. 

 

Paragraph Two-

Old, Sidetracking, true about Graham couldn’t ride the bike but not true about not here to discuss that old embellished, sneaky, bullying story and how I perceive you to be either.

 

If Funk needs to question my comments or objections, please Call this witness to court.

 

 

Questions:

How old are you?- Happy Birthday.

You were aware that we were having an altercation just minutes prior?

Where you not antagonizing, baiting, enjoying & yelling?  –

Through friends of Jeff you had learned a sense of prior knowledge?

You have been inside my home?  

bottom of page