- Paragraph One -
please also see Outline, Bruises & Downloadable File for full copy (includes pictures).
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Swedelius reply to
Jeff Funk's - misleading - Paragraph One -
- (mainly pertaining to Summary of Restraining Orders #0000666 and #0000670)-
Placer County
Superior Court –Tahoe Division,
PO Box 5669 /
2601 N. Tahoe Blvd.,
Tahoe City, CA 96145
MS. SWEDELIUS REPLY TO- MR. FUNK’S DV- 120 Response – REASONS, I DO NOT AGREE-
TDR # 0000666.
(in addition)- #0000670.
First Paragraph—
Sentence One and Two-
Your honor, it is because we do not agree; that I have come to you to be heard.
Sentence Three-
I will agree to Jeffrey Funk’s statement that he has ignored my dozens of texts and steers clear in public only to show-
However, Mr. Funk repeatedly initiating and being an aggressive bully to me when coming to my neighborhood.
I will show the court how quick Mr. Funk is to dare & introduce frivolous to premeditated threats.
(see attached texts)
My texts were civil attempts to correspond. He clearly states he states he ignored my texts however disconcerting to me Mr. Funk clearly states steer clear ‘in public’;
fore your Honor this is true-
Mr. Jeff Funk will seek the solitude and place of vulnerability rather than public places with majority of his cruelty.
Texting communication has better success to not be interrupted (as Funk & myself have had problems in pro per) texts can be dated & referenced if needed, (please see attached).
Again, I agree Mr. Funk choices to ignore me and my civil pleas.
Sentence Four-
Even in his opening paragraph to the court, Mr. Funk is not only embellishing but continuing to state this story untrue and with defaming comments about me.
Example: Lets get the fact’s straight,
Fist Jeff did not ‘have to’ call the police.
Second- in your testimony you wrote, “I (Jeffrey Funk) had to call the police on Ms. Swedelius…”
Third, In Fact, your girlfriend called the police.
{This will also shown later to be consistent with coaching and bullying practices.}
Fourth – “…because I (Jeffrey Funk) found her trespassing and trying to break into my car…”
The fact is Jeffrey, this is your false accusation.
And your (and entourage) need to stop with accusations and vengeful commentary.
Fact is, Mr. Funk lied to me.
Fact is, Mr. Funk lied to me about a specific question which could have prevented this whole accident.
Fact is, scenario was actually a coincidence and accident. Could have been prevented per Jeffrey had not lied.
Fact Jeffrey himself in fact called the sheriff’s off!
Fact is this elective sentence to which the scenario you flavor with slight of story in your opening paragraph did not even deem worthy of a police report.
To which scenario the tries to further describe in his DV-120 Response paragraph Four with false information.
Mr. Funk has prior knowledge to my history so my response is feels like there are tactics of extortion and coercion on my real life facts, where he embellishes upon his stories.
I will elaborate and show how he tells only partial/slighted story or gets events confused with another.
In my opinion Mr. Jeffrey Funk is comfortable acting inappropriately& righteously.
I am concerned Mr. Funk has the potential to become irate & irrational.
I am concerned Mr. Funk shows intent to advance rather than subside. It is about the fact that Jeffrey Funk is an aggressor.
My concern is in discovery during our relationship Mr. Funk has had a past with an anger control issue, he lied to me about what he was doing until he had to served jail time because he violated your probation
My concern is that I have established plenty of real time scenario’s that have happened, where he rehears an a premeditated threats. Currently as I came to the court to protect myself, Mr. Funk then and only then advanced TDR paperwork on me- however, asked the court if he could still come to my neighbors?
I am extremely concerned that his paperwork he filed on me could interfere with my major cases and a concern for long term privacy: regarding violent Attacker/ Steven Bealor/ and a Grand Theft Auto (recovery) case I am waiting for more information to send my Damages to the Probation Officer.
My concerns again that Jeffrey Funk’s anger is increasing and I do not need him near me, family or my home.
Mr. Funk is a regular to two known party (rental) homes on my (tiny- non thru way- only one (entrance/exit)) street.
The concerns are that I do not trust Mr. Funk and do not need him to be near me or my home.
He comes near my residence frequently and these are some of the issues of Funk’s Routine: Agenda, Attitude, Frequency, Proximity, etc…
In my opinion Jeffrey Funk is well educated and been in trouble before with a personality to be vengeful.
In my opinion as well he is paranoid for numerous other reasons.
In my opinion your honor Jeffrey Funk also (in my case) displays scenario’s he wants to be the King of the Roost and he seemed to find satisfaction in getting hens to fight.
In my opinion he has got a hotheaded personal vendetta toward me because I do not find him King of the Crop anymore.
I am concerned Jeffrey Funk acts before he thinks with exaggerated claims, and hostile judgments.
My civil attempts to protect and preserve my privacy and wellbeing have been ignored or intentionally betrayed. Funk has taught girlfriend & others to not have regard or moral interest for me. This is elective behavior of Jeffrey Funk to ever need come to my street. This is and has been my established place of residence of near two decades. Mr. Funk violates my sense of security, tranquility and rehabilitation.
Jeffrey Funk states in his fifth sentence, which is opposing his third sentence, that he ignores my civil requests (text messages) now saying, he says replied to me. {Which is it(?) -he ignores my many pleads or do I hang on that one text that he may or may nor crudely reply? I agree, Funk nor girlfriend have ever showed interest nor has ever had good regard toward me, my privacy and wellbeing.
This is not about getting sidetracked on how many civil requests where asked, nor how many years I have been putting up with Mr. Funk’s nonsense. It is not the fact that we need to hash out microscopic details of events. In my opinion he tries to make a mountain out of a mole hill or give an inch take a mile kind of person, so I’ve learned it’s better to let sleeping dogs lye & not always contest him.
The mere reason we are here today is to get legal &/or professional help to stop the nonsense. This includes protect and restore my peace and right to quite enjoyment of my residence/ habitat. Instead of Jeffrey Funk acknowledging, showing remorse and or apologizing and making a plea; he gets his girlfriend and/or others involved, rather he points finger at me, then asks the court if he can still come to my neighbors???
Under much duress.
I am concerned that Jeffrey Funk does not understand the severity of my concerns.
I will further describe to the court in
2011, we established it was not good idea for Funk to live on Park Lane, with me.
2012 we established it is not good when Mr. Funk electively comes to this residential area.
2013 we established it is not good when Mr. Funk electively comes to this residential area.
2014 we established it is not good when Mr. Funk electively comes to this residential area.
It is about the fact that Jeffrey Funk is an aggressor and not welcomed near me or my place of residence.
Over a detailed timeline I can show many recorded events, if the court requires more documentation.
Jeffrey Funk has caused me much anguish per his extreme passive aggressive behaviors, we will see some in the document.
Mr. Funk embellishes or makes up scenarios’ wants me to stay away from his girlfriends, wants me to stay away from his, wants me to stay away from his camp” all the while admits he doesn’t address my civil requests, no seek me out in public. Upon my last encounter near my established residence his threats escalated to physical. When I come to the court to ask for help, ready to substantiate proof- he serves me with an TDR. Next he asks the Judge, if he can still come to my neighbors.
We are here today because it is not ok (no matter where the location, no matter the excuse) for Mr. Funk to swing his fist toward any soul (my face) in anger (period).
We are here today because it is not ok to me near me and my residential environment because has proven timelessly to inappropriately advance with much damage in his wake.
In short:
Mr. Funk advanced.
Mr. Funk’s advances resulted in harm.